return to navigation page incoming

March 14, 2015

Adding up the Zeros

With lift-served skiing in its death throes in Washington, it's time to start thinking about something to fill that lightweight spring and summer slot in your touring quiver. Light, because there will definitely be some long snowless approaches with skis racked on your pack, and with good edgehold because what's left of the snow will definitely be hard at times, like compacted ice from previous decades or centuries.

A little bit of camber and very subtle rocker at the tip and tail

Based on a quick demo a month ago in Bend, I figured the Blizzard Zero G 95 would be a great candidate, and our rep Dave was kind enough to bring a 171 by for me to try. I mounted them up with some Dynafit Speed Radicals to fit my super short 288mm BSL Atomic Backland Carbons, trimmed some G3 Alpinists to fit, and adjusted the base edge bevel in the tip to ~ 2 degrees as Dave suggested. I've been skiing the Zero G's on the groomers for the past few weeks, along with other 2016 skis I've been wanting to try.

Beefy sidewall construction in the middle of the ski

After a few years of getting their toes wet in the touring market with skis like the Scout and Kabookie - basically stripped down versions of the popular Cochise and Bonafide skis with no Titanal and less fiberglass to save weight - Blizzard's Zero G series is a completely new ultralight line in widths of 108mm, 95mm, and 85mm. With Paulownia wood cores and nearly full length sidewalls, the Zero G skis employ what Blizzard calls "Carbon Drive" technology. Carbon Drive uses a structure of finely woven carbon that's flat and narrow in the center of the ski but incorporates a 3D wrap from edge to edge at the tips and tails starting where the sidewalls end. The idea is to add torsional rigidity at the ends of the ski without adding weight. You can see where the carbon is in the photo below.

My front lawn, very much like some of the approaches we'll be seeing this spring
Mount according to the molded in "bumps," not the decal on the ski (or measure from the tail)

As one might expect from Blizzard, one of the few companies in the ski business that steadfastly refuses to "water down" the performance of their skis to broaden their appeal to the less aggressive or skilled, the Zero G 95 is a serious tool for technically solid skiers. The edgehold is incredible, sometimes overpowering the dampness of this 1208 gram ski (this is averaged weight, mine weigh 1207 and 1209 grams respectively). Several testers at the Bend demo sessions commented that the skis felt "chattery" and I felt the same sensation on larger radius turns coming well across the fall line. In a sliding turn, the skis (this applied to the 108 and 85 as well) wanted so badly to carve, but didn't have the mass to stay connected to the snow, that they'd chatter mid turn. Staying in the fall line and railing shorter radius turns stopped the problem, but I'm pretty sure I'll never encounter these same conditions while touring (this was smooth, groomed VERY hard snow which Westcoasters commonly call ice). On the other hand, the Zero G 95 is precisely what I want on my feet on a critical icy volcano. We'll see how these work in wilder conditions as the year progresses, but I'm thinking they'll be perfect for tough spring and summer conditions in this low snow year. Looking for more good news? The retail price on the Zero G 95 is $699, quite a bit cheaper than most other cutting edge light touring skis on the market.

Turn initiation was surprisingly predictable and smooth, which I attribute to minimal camber and the rockered tip and tail, and I predict they'll be fine on higher angle terrain where you can't afford to miss a turn. Straight line stability is outstanding for such a light and short ski; I found them quite confidence-inspiring at 35 mph rolling through Green Valley, not something I'm used to in a ski this light. Again, chances are slim you'll ever use the ski in this manner, but it's nice to know.

I didn't check the 20 meter radius, but the 1150 gram weight was optimistic - my skis weigh 1207 and 1209 grams per.
Not sure the Austrians understand the American concept of "OG" but that's what I thought of when I first saw the graphics

Very different tip shape than one of the obvious competitors, the 176 Dynafit Denali. Contact length of the two skis is nearly identical. MSRP $699.00 USD

Since first skiing the Zero G 95, I've continued to de-tune the base edge bevel at the tip, moving it further back, and changed the side edge bevel on the entire ski from 2 degrees to 1 degree. This seems to calm the ski's edgy personality a bit. A few days after writing this, I tested the Zero G 95 for a few hours at Mt. Rainier. Uphill, as you might expect, they were outstanding. A 1200 gram ski with good torsional stiffness and a "classic" medium range sidecut stomps the uphill. The skiing was great as well, ranging from soft corn over frozen chicken heads in the Nisqually Chute to isothermal glop over a consolidated base. I'm sold on this ski for a mountaineering ski that will handle a wide range of conditions well and is confidence-inspiring on the steep.

The Zero G's in their natural habitat

Previous Incoming Pages:

February, 2015

January, 2015

December, 2014

November, 2014

October, 2014

September, 2014

August, 2014

July, 2014

June, 2014

May, 2014

April, 2014

March, 2014

February, 2014

January, 2014

December, 2013

November, 2013

October, 2013

September, 2013

August, 2013

July, 2013

June, 2013

May, 2013

April, 2013

March, 2013

February, 2013

January, 2013

December, 2012

November, 2012

October, 2012

September, 2012

August, 2012

July, 2012

June, 2012

May, 2012

April, 2012

March, 2012

February, 2012

January, 2012

December, 2011

November, 2011

October, 2011

September, 2011

August, 2011

July, 2011

June, 2011

May, 2011

April, 2011

March, 2011

February, 2011

January, 2011

December, 2010

November, 2010

October, 2010

September, 2010

August, 2010

July, 2010

June, 2010

May, 2010

April, 2010

China: Wandering in the Middle Kingdom

March, 2010

February, 2010

January, 2010

December, 2009

November, 2009

October, 2009

September, 2009

August, 2009

July, 2009

June, 2009

May, 2009

April, 2009

March, 2009

February, 2009

January, 2009

December, 2008

November, 2008

October, 2008

September, 2008

August, 2008

June, 2008

May, 2008

April, 2008

March, 2008

February, 2008

January, 2008

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

"Incoming" covers developments that have personal interest to me (ie. gear I might consider acquiring, or events I feel may impact the sport of skiing) - it is by no means meant to be a comprehensive enumeration of gear or events in the ski world at large. Feel free to contact me via the link below with news or images that may be of interest . . .

send mail to